{"id":1643,"date":"2025-09-17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/APNOKACA.com\/blog\/?p=105601"},"modified":"2025-09-17","slug":"194j-vs-44ad-tax-scrutiny-on-india-s-content-creators-consultants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/APNOKACA.com\/blog\/194j-vs-44ad-tax-scrutiny-on-india-s-content-creators-consultants","title":{"rendered":"194J vs. 44AD: Tax Scrutiny on India's Content Creators & Consultants"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
<\/div>
<\/i> Income tax <\/a>

194J vs. 44AD: Tax Scrutiny on India's Content Creators & Consultants <\/h1> <\/div>

This blog post addresses the increasing tax notices faced by Indian content creators, influencers, and consultants due to a common mismatch: clients deducting TDS under Section 194J while they file income tax returns under Section 44AD. It breaks down the key tax provisions (194J, 44AD, 44ADA), explaining what each means for freelancers and businesses. The article clarifies that a 194J deduction doesn't automatically mandate filing under 44ADA; the crucial factor is whether the profession is listed under Section 44AA. It details potential impacts on tax burden, cash flow, and the need for increased documentation, while also offering actionable steps for creators and consultants to ensure compliance, including clarifying work nature, maintaining records, client communication, cash flow monitoring, and seeking professional tax advice. <\/p>

<\/figure> <\/div> <\/div> <\/section>
<\/div> Krishna Gopal Varshney <\/a>

An editor at Myitronline<\/p> <\/div>